Summary
When you're a $10 billion regulation-wielding federal behemoth, you don't get bogged down in messy details -- such as the effect on U.S. jobs -- when analyzing the outcome of your policies.
That much was clear in an eye-opening exchange between Mathy Stanislaus, assistant administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and Rep. Cory Gardner, R-Colo., during a House committee hearing. Repeatedly Rep. Gardner asked whether the EPA considers the effects of its expanding regulations on U.S. jobs.See the full content of this document
Extract
Epa's Jobs 'Policy': What Cost-Benefit?
The best answer Mr. Stanislaus could muster...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
