Summary
As solicitor general, U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan argued for the same misguided outcome -- and the same dubious constitutional reasoning behind that outcome -- that the United States v. Comstock majority announced this month.
Just as she urged, that majority further -- and wrongly -- overstretched the Constitution's "necessary and proper" clause to uphold indefinite "civil commitment" of mentally ill federal sex offenders who've completed their sentences.See the full content of this document
Extract
Extraconstitutional Kagan: Unnecessary & Improper
That practice should have been struck do...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
